DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Lincoln MKS vs 2016 Chrysler 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln MKS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeChrysler
MKSModel200
2012Model year2016
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3605 cc
355 HPPower294 HP
475 NmTorque355 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 SelectShiftGears9
255/45 R19VTyre size215/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5184 mmLength4884 mm
1928 mmWidth1871 mm
1565 mmHeight1491 mm
1940 KgWeight1650 Kg
2868 mmWheelbase2742 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Lincoln MKS and 2016 Chrysler 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln MKS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…