DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Chrysler 200 vs 2014 Ford Flex Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeFord
200ModelFlex
2016Model year2014
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats6-7
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3605 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
294 HPPower364 HP
355 NmTorque475 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank71 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt
10,2 ltAverage consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
9Gears6
215/55 R17Tyre size235/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4884 mmLength5130 mm
1871 mmWidth1930 mm
1491 mmHeight1727 mm
1650 KgWeight—
2742 mmWheelbase2995 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Chrysler 200 and 2014 Ford Flex approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…