DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Chrysler 200 vs 2015 Mazda CX-9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeMazda
200ModelCX-9
2011Model year2015
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3605 ccEngine displacement3726 cc
287 HPPower273 HP
353 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank76 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/55 R17; 225/50 R18Tyre size245/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4870 mmLength5232 mm
1843 mmWidth1935 mm
1482 mmHeight1727 mm
1622 KgWeight1958 Kg
2765 mmWheelbase2875 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Chrysler 200 and 2015 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…