DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mazda CX-9 vs 2011 Chrysler 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeChrysler
CX-9Model200
2015Model year2011
SUVBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3726 ccEngine displacement3605 cc
273 HPPower287 HP
270 NmTorque353 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank64 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
245/60 R18Tyre size225/55 R17; 225/50 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5232 mmLength4870 mm
1935 mmWidth1843 mm
1727 mmHeight1482 mm
1958 KgWeight1622 Kg
2875 mmWheelbase2765 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mazda CX-9 and 2011 Chrysler 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…