DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mini Hatch vs 2013 Chevrolet Trax Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Trax

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.25–64.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeChevrolet
HatchModelTrax
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeSUV
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
197 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
112 HPPower115 HP
270 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank53 lt
4,2 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x2
6Gears5
—TransmissionManual
175/65 R15 84HTyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3723 mmLength4248 mm
1683 mmWidth1776 mm
1407 mmHeight1647 mm
1090 KgWeight1287 kg
—Luggage capacity356 lt
2467 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Mini Hatch

No additional feature records are available.

Chevrolet TraxDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTyre Pressure MonitoringArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorRear Fog LightsAlloy Wheels

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mini Hatch and 2013 Chevrolet Trax approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Trax leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…