DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2004 Toyota Crown Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeToyota
TrackerModelCrown
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2491 cc
167 HPPower200 HP
220 NmTorque250 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption—
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/70 R15Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4059 mmLength4835 mm
1694 mmWidth1765 mm
1689 mmHeight1510 mm
1335 KgWeight1630 Kg
2479 mmWheelbase2780 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chevrolet Tracker and 2004 Toyota Crown approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…