2003 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 2.5 i V6 (167 Hp) 2003Overall Score69.25/100
2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2004 Audi A6 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Audi
A6
Audi A6 2.5 TDI V6 (163 Hp) 2004Overall Score69.75/100
WINNER
Audi A6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
69.25–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Chevrolet TrackerSpecificationAudi A6
ChevroletMakeAudi
TrackerModelA6
2003Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Chevrolet TrackerSpecificationAudi A6
—0–100 km/h10,4 s
160 km/hTop speed203 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2496 cc
167 HPPower163 HP
220 NmTorque310 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Chevrolet TrackerSpecificationAudi A6
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption12 lt
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
—Average consumption8,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Chevrolet TrackerSpecificationAudi A6
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears6
215/70 R15Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Chevrolet TrackerSpecificationAudi A6
4059 mmLength4810 mm
1694 mmWidth1852 mm
1689 mmHeight1551 mm
1335 KgWeight1815 Kg
2479 mmWheelbase2757 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Chevrolet Tracker and 2004 Audi A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi A6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…