2004 • Audi
A6
Audi A6 2.5 TDI V6 (163 Hp) 2004Overall Score69.75/100
2004 Audi A6 vs 2003 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 2.5 i V6 (167 Hp) 2003Overall Score69.25/100
WINNER
Audi A6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
69.75–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi A6SpecificationChevrolet Tracker
AudiMakeChevrolet
A6ModelTracker
2004Model year2003
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Audi A6SpecificationChevrolet Tracker
10,4 s0–100 km/h—
203 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2496 ccEngine displacement2494 cc
163 HPPower167 HP
310 NmTorque220 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Audi A6SpecificationChevrolet Tracker
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank66 lt
12 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption11,2 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi A6SpecificationChevrolet Tracker
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
225/55 R17Tyre size215/70 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi A6SpecificationChevrolet Tracker
4810 mmLength4059 mm
1852 mmWidth1694 mm
1551 mmHeight1689 mm
1815 KgWeight1335 Kg
2757 mmWheelbase2479 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Audi A6 and 2003 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi A6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…