DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2003 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeSuzuki
TrackerModelGrand Vitara
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats—
3Doors—

Performance

160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
129 HPPower109 HP
182 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank0 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
195/75 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

3780 mmLength—
1694 mmWidth—
1689 mmHeight—
1180 KgWeight—
2200 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Chevrolet Tracker and 2003 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…