DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2003 Rover 45 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeRover
TrackerModel45
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
160 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
129 HPPower150 HP
182 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/75 R15Tyre size205/45 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3780 mmLength4517 mm
1694 mmWidth1696 mm
1689 mmHeight1394 mm
1180 KgWeight1340 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Chevrolet Tracker and 2003 Rover 45 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…