DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2000 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeCitroen
TrackerModelXM
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,3 s
160 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
129 HPPower147 HP
182 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption14,5 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/75 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3780 mmLength4708 mm
1694 mmWidth1794 mm
1689 mmHeight1394 mm
1180 KgWeight1401 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Chevrolet Tracker and 2000 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…