2000 • Peugeot
605
Peugeot 605 2.0 Turbo (141 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
2000 Peugeot 605 vs 2000 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 2.0 i 16V (129 Hp) 2000Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Tracker
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Peugeot 605SpecificationChevrolet Tracker
PeugeotMakeChevrolet
605ModelTracker
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Peugeot 605SpecificationChevrolet Tracker
10,0 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
141 HPPower129 HP
225 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Peugeot 605SpecificationChevrolet Tracker
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank56 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Peugeot 605SpecificationChevrolet Tracker
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size195/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Peugeot 605SpecificationChevrolet Tracker
4765 mmLength3780 mm
1799 mmWidth1694 mm
1417 mmHeight1689 mm
1430 KgWeight1180 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Peugeot 605 and 2000 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…