DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Chevrolet Tracker vs 1998 Mazda Capella Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeMazda
TrackerModelCapella
1998Model year1998
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

150 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
122 HPPower101 HP
182 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption—
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
195/75 R15Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

3780 mmLength4575 mm
1694 mmWidth1695 mm
1689 mmHeight1440 mm
1210 KgWeight1210 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Chevrolet Tracker and 1998 Mazda Capella approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…