DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mazda Capella vs 1998 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeChevrolet
CapellaModelTracker
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
101 HPPower122 HP
230 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption10,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size195/75 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength3780 mm
1695 mmWidth1694 mm
1440 mmHeight1689 mm
1210 KgWeight1210 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mazda Capella and 1998 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…