DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2003 Toyota Ist Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Ist

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeToyota
TrackerModelIst
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

150 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
97 HPPower105 HP
133 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195//75 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3650 mmLength3855 mm
1630 mmWidth1695 mm
1650 mmHeight1530 mm
1060 KgWeight1000 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2370 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Chevrolet Tracker and 2003 Toyota Ist approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Ist leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…