2003 • Holden
Cruze
Holden Cruze 1.5i 16V (100 Hp) 2003Overall Score56.5/100
2003 Holden Cruze vs 2003 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 1.6 i 16V (97 Hp) 2003Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Holden Cruze
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden CruzeSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
HoldenMakeChevrolet
CruzeModelTracker
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Holden CruzeSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1490 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
100 HPPower97 HP
138 NmTorque133 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Holden CruzeSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
PetrolFuel typePetrol
41 ltFuel tank42 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption—
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Holden CruzeSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size195//75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Holden CruzeSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
3625 mmLength3650 mm
1640 mmWidth1630 mm
1605 mmHeight1650 mm
1000 KgWeight1060 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Holden Cruze and 2003 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden Cruze leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…