DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2000 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Grand Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeSuzuki
TrackerModelGrand Vitara
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

150 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
97 HPPower107 HP
133 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
195//75 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3650 mmLength4090 mm
1630 mmWidth1700 mm
1650 mmHeight1690 mm
1060 KgWeight1270 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2480 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Chevrolet Tracker and 2000 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Grand Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…