2000 • Suzuki
Escudo
Suzuki Escudo 1.6i (107 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Suzuki Escudo vs 2000 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 1.6 i 16V (97 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Suzuki Escudo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Suzuki EscudoSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
SuzukiMakeChevrolet
EscudoModelTracker
2000Model year2000
—Body typeOff-road vehicle
—Seats5
—Doors3
Performance
Suzuki EscudoSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
107 HPPower97 HP
144 NmTorque133 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Suzuki EscudoSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank42 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Suzuki EscudoSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size195//75 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Suzuki EscudoSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
—Length3650 mm
—Width1630 mm
—Height1650 mm
—Weight1060 Kg
—Wheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Suzuki Escudo and 2000 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Suzuki Escudo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…