1998 • Suzuki
Escudo
Suzuki Escudo 1.6i (101 Hp) 1998Overall Score55.5/100
1998 Suzuki Escudo vs 1998 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 1.6 i 16V 4WD (97 Hp) 1998Overall Score55.25/100
WINNER
Suzuki Escudo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
55.5–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Suzuki EscudoSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
SuzukiMakeChevrolet
EscudoModelTracker
1998Model year1998
—Body typeOff-road vehicle
—Seats5
—Doors3
Performance
Suzuki EscudoSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
101 HPPower97 HP
134 NmTorque133 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Suzuki EscudoSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Suzuki EscudoSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
—Length3650 mm
—Width1630 mm
—Height1650 mm
—Weight1235 Kg
—Wheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Suzuki Escudo and 1998 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Suzuki Escudo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…