DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Chevrolet Tavera vs 2013 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeKia
TaveraModelOptima
2013Model year2013
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,4 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2190 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
117 HPPower150 HP
183 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
0 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption5,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,0 lt
—Average consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—

Dimensions

—Length4845 mm
—Width1830 mm
—Height1455 mm
—Weight1587-1648 Kg
—Wheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Chevrolet Tavera and 2013 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…