DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Chevrolet Tavera vs 2013 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeMazda
TaveraModel3
2012Model year2013
MinivanBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,9 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2190 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
117 HPPower120 HP
183 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption6,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size205/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4460 mm
—Width1795 mm
—Height1450 mm
—Weight1205 Kg
—Wheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Chevrolet Tavera and 2013 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…