DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Chevrolet Tavera vs 2003 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeMG
TaveraModelZR
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,0 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2190 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
117 HPPower113 HP
183 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption7,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/50 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4011 mm
—Width1690 mm
—Height1400 mm
—Weight1155 Kg
—Wheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Chevrolet Tavera and 2003 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…