DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Chevrolet Spark vs 2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeAlfa Romeo
SparkModelMiTo
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4/5
5Doors3

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
154 km/hTop speed184 km/h
995 ccEngine displacement875 cc
68 HPPower105 HP
93 NmTorque145 Nm
3Cylinders2

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption5,0 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
ManualTransmission—
13Tyre size195/55 R16
NoABSYes

Dimensions

3640 mmLength4063 mm
1597 mmWidth1720 mm
1522 mmHeight1446 mm
939 kgWeight1130 Kg
170 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2511 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Chevrolet Spark and 2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…