DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2013 Chevrolet Spark Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeChevrolet
MiToModelSpark
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4/5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

11,4 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
184 km/hTop speed154 km/h
875 ccEngine displacement995 cc
105 HPPower68 HP
145 NmTorque93 Nm
2Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank35 lt
5,0 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—TransmissionManual
195/55 R16Tyre size13
YesABSNo

Dimensions

4063 mmLength3640 mm
1720 mmWidth1597 mm
1446 mmHeight1522 mm
1130 KgWeight939 kg
—Luggage capacity170 lt
2511 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2013 Chevrolet Spark approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…