DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Chevrolet Omega vs 1997 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–63.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeHolden
OmegaModelCommodore
1996Model year1997
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
215 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4093 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
168 HPPower200 HP
285 NmTorque304 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption10,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
11 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15 VTyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4738 mmLength4884 mm
1760 mmWidth1842 mm
1418 mmHeight1450 mm
1505 KgWeight1550 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2788 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Chevrolet Omega and 1997 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…