DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford Thunderbird vs 1996 Chevrolet Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Thunderbird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeChevrolet
ThunderbirdModelOmega
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
180 km/hTop speed215 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement4093 cc
141 HPPower168 HP
292 NmTorque285 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank75 lt
12 ltAverage consumption11 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/70 R15 HTyre size195/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5088 mmLength4738 mm
1847 mmWidth1760 mm
1333 mmHeight1418 mm
1619 KgWeight1505 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford Thunderbird and 1996 Chevrolet Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Thunderbird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…