DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chevrolet Metro vs 2004 Audi A2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Metro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeAudi
MetroModelA2
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,6 s
165 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1422 cc
79 HPPower75 HP
99 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
39 ltFuel tank34 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
—Average consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/80 R13Tyre size175/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3790 mmLength3826 mm
1590 mmWidth1673 mm
1390 mmHeight1553 mm
860 KgWeight1095 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2405 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chevrolet Metro and 2004 Audi A2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Metro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…