2004 • Toyota
Probox
Toyota Probox 1.4 D (75 Hp) 2004Overall Score55.5/100
2004 Toyota Probox vs 2004 Chevrolet Metro Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Chevrolet
Metro
Chevrolet Metro 1.3 LSI (79 Hp) 2004Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Metro
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota ProboxSpecificationChevrolet Metro
ToyotaMakeChevrolet
ProboxModelMetro
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Toyota ProboxSpecificationChevrolet Metro
0 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1364 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
75 HPPower79 HP
170 NmTorque99 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota ProboxSpecificationChevrolet Metro
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank39 lt
—Urban consumption6,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota ProboxSpecificationChevrolet Metro
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size155/80 R13
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota ProboxSpecificationChevrolet Metro
4195 mmLength3790 mm
1695 mmWidth1590 mm
1525 mmHeight1390 mm
1030 KgWeight860 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Toyota Probox and 2004 Chevrolet Metro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Metro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…