DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Chevrolet Impala vs 2000 Pontiac Firebird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Pontiac Firebird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.5–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakePontiac
ImpalaModelFirebird
1996Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
6Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,0 s
195 km/hTop speed250 km/h
5733 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
264 HPPower314 HP
447 NmTorque461 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
87 ltFuel tank59 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears6
—Tyre size235/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

5439 mmLength4910 mm
1968 mmWidth1890 mm
1415 mmHeight1300 mm
1850 KgWeight1585 Kg
2945 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Chevrolet Impala and 2000 Pontiac Firebird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Pontiac Firebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…