DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs 1996 Chevrolet Impala Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Camaro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

82.5–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeChevrolet
CamaroModelImpala
2000Model year1996
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats6
3Doors4

Performance

6,0 s0–100 km/h—
254 km/hTop speed195 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5733 cc
288 HPPower264 HP
437 NmTorque447 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank87 lt
19,8 ltUrban consumption—
9,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears—
245/50 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4908 mmLength5439 mm
1882 mmWidth1968 mm
1322 mmHeight1415 mm
1644 KgWeight1850 Kg
2566 mmWheelbase2945 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Chevrolet Camaro and 1996 Chevrolet Impala approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Camaro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…