DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Chevrolet Impala vs 2000 Chevrolet Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

69.75–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeChevrolet
ImpalaModelOmega
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
200 km/hTop speed216 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
203 HPPower200 HP
305 NmTorque304 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank75 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5080 mmLength4880 mm
1855 mmWidth1825 mm
1455 mmHeight1440 mm
1560 KgWeight1640 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Chevrolet Impala and 2000 Chevrolet Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…