DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden Caprice vs 1999 Chevrolet Impala Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Caprice

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.75–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeChevrolet
CapriceModelImpala
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,5 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
204 HPPower203 HP
305 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,8 lt
—Average consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/55 R16VTyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5237 mmLength5080 mm
1847 mmWidth1855 mm
1459 mmHeight1455 mm
1689 KgWeight1560 Kg
2939 mmWheelbase2805 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden Caprice and 1999 Chevrolet Impala approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Caprice leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…