DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Chevrolet Epica vs 2010 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Epica

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–61.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeVolvo
EpicaModelV50
2011Model year2010
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
207 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1993 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
143 HPPower136 HP
195 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank52 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4804 mmLength4522 mm
1807 mmWidth1845 mm
1449 mmHeight1457 mm
1500 KgWeight1472 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Chevrolet Epica and 2010 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Epica leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…