DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Chevrolet Epica vs 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Epica

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 5.25 points.

62.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeMitsubishi
EpicaModelLancer
2011Model year2011
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4/5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
207 km/hTop speed191 km/h
1993 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
143 HPPower117 HP
195 NmTorque154 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank59 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4804 mmLength4570 mm
1807 mmWidth1760 mm
1449 mmHeight1480 mm
1500 KgWeight1260 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Chevrolet Epica and 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Epica leads the E-Kıyasla score by 5.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…