DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Chevrolet Cruze vs 2013 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

64.25–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeKia
CruzeModelOptima
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,8 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
190 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1685 cc
124 HPPower136 HP
154 NmTorque325 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4597 mmLength4845 mm
1788 mmWidth1830 mm
1477 mmHeight1455 mm
1300 kgWeight1500 Kg
450 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2795 mm

Additional Features

Chevrolet CruzeDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRCruise ControlTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsSunroof
Kia Optima

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Chevrolet Cruze and 2013 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…