DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Kia Optima vs 2013 Chevrolet Cruze Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

64.75–64.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeChevrolet
OptimaModelCruze
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
202 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1685 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
136 HPPower124 HP
325 NmTorque154 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—TransmissionManual
205/60 R16Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4845 mmLength4597 mm
1830 mmWidth1788 mm
1455 mmHeight1477 mm
1500 KgWeight1300 kg
—Luggage capacity450 lt
2795 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Kia Optima

No additional feature records are available.

Chevrolet CruzeDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRCruise ControlTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsSunroof

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Kia Optima and 2013 Chevrolet Cruze approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…