DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chevrolet Classic vs 2004 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Classic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeSaab
ClassicModel9-3
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
180 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2171 cc
141 HPPower125 HP
203 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
54 ltFuel tank62 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption9 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
205/65 R15Tyre size215/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4835 mmLength4635 mm
1760 mmWidth1762 mm
1425 mmHeight1466 mm
1375 KgWeight1610 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chevrolet Classic and 2004 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Classic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…