DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chevrolet Classic vs 2004 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Classic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeFord
ClassicModelMondeo
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
180 km/hTop speed215 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
141 HPPower145 HP
203 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank58 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4835 mmLength4731 mm
1760 mmWidth1812 mm
1425 mmHeight1429 mm
1375 KgWeight1376 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2754 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chevrolet Classic and 2004 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Classic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…