DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2011 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 7 points.

75.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeChevrolet
CaptivaModelCaptiva
2013Model year2011
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
180 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement2231 cc
163 HPPower163 HP
400 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x2DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
AutomaticTransmission—
17Tyre size235/60 R17
NoABSYes

Dimensions

4679 mmLength4673 mm
1868 mmWidth1868-1849 mm
1756 mmHeight1756 mm
1903 kgWeight1778 Kg
447 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Chevrolet Captiva and 2011 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 7 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…