DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2013 Audi Q7 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi Q7

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 6.25 points.

75.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeAudi
CaptivaModelQ7
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
180 km/hTop speed216 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
163 HPPower245 HP
400 NmTorque550 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank100 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x2Drivetrain4x4
6Gears8 Tiptronic
AutomaticTransmission—
17Tyre size235/60 R18
NoABSYes

Dimensions

4679 mmLength5089 mm
1868 mmWidth1983 mm
1756 mmHeight1737 mm
1903 kgWeight2270 Kg
447 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase3002 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Chevrolet Captiva and 2013 Audi Q7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi Q7 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 6.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…