DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2004 Opel Vectra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 21.25 points.

75.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeOpel
CaptivaModelVectra
2013Model year2004
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
180 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
163 HPPower100 HP
400 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank61 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption9,9 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x2DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
AutomaticTransmission—
17Tyre size195/65 R15
NoABSYes

Dimensions

4679 mmLength4596 mm
1868 mmWidth1798 mm
1756 mmHeight1460 mm
1903 kgWeight1360 Kg
447 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Chevrolet Captiva and 2004 Opel Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 21.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…