DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2011 Audi A5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeAudi
CaptivaModelA5
2013Model year2011
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
180 km/hTop speed212 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
163 HPPower150 HP
400 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank63 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption5,4 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x2DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
AutomaticTransmission—
17Tyre size225/50 R17
NoABSYes

Dimensions

4679 mmLength4712 mm
1868 mmWidth1854 mm
1756 mmHeight1391 mm
1903 kgWeight1580 Kg
447 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2810 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Chevrolet Captiva and 2011 Audi A5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…