DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2014 Volvo XC60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeVolvo
CaptivaModelXC60
2015Model year2014
SUVBody typeSUV
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,1 s
0 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
258 HPPower254 HP
288 NmTorque360 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Average consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/70 R16; 235/55 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4673 mmLength4644 mm
1849 mmWidth1891 mm
1727 mmHeight1713 mm
—Weight1816-1935 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase2774 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Chevrolet Captiva and 2014 Volvo XC60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…