DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2011 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeFord
CaptivaModelRanger
2011Model year2011
SUVBody typePick-up
5/7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h14,9 s
190 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2384 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
167 HPPower125 HP
230 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank80 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
235/60 R17 HTyre size255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4673 mmLength5359 mm
1849 mmWidth1850 mm
1756 mmHeight1815 mm
1693-1798 KgWeight2048 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase3220 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Chevrolet Captiva and 2011 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…