DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2015 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeMazda
CaptivaModelCX-5
2014Model year2015
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,0 s
0 km/hTop speed192 km/h
2384 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
182 HPPower192 HP
233 NmTorque256 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank58 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,0 lt
—Average consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
235/60 R17; 235/55 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength4555 mm
1849 mmWidth1840 mm
1702 mmHeight1710 mm
1724-1732 KgWeight1440 Kg
2708 mmWheelbase2070 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Chevrolet Captiva and 2015 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…