DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2014 Suzuki Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.

65.5–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeSuzuki
CaptivaModelVitara
2009Model year2014
SUVBody typeSUV
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
184 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1373 cc
150 HPPower140 HP
320 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank47 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
215/70 R16; 235/60 R17; 235/55 R18Tyre size215/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4635 mmLength4175 mm
1850-1870 mmWidth1775 mm
1720-1755 mmHeight1610 mm
1770/1820 KgWeight1210 Kg
2705 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Chevrolet Captiva and 2014 Suzuki Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…