DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2008 Volvo XC60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 13.5 points.

60.25–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeVolvo
CaptivaModelXC60
2008Model year2008
SUVBody typeSUV
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,7 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
181 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
127 HPPower185 HP
295 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
215/70 R16Tyre size235/65 R17; 235/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4635 mmLength4628 mm
1850-1870 mmWidth1891 mm
1720-1755 mmHeight1713 mm
1770 KgWeight1801 Kg
2705 mmWheelbase2774 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Chevrolet Captiva and 2008 Volvo XC60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 13.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…