DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Chevrolet Camaro vs 2010 Chrysler 300 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Camaro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

92.5–91.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeChrysler
CamaroModel300
2013Model year2010
CabrioBody typeEstate
—Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

5,4 s0–100 km/h5,0 s
250 km/hTop speed270 km/h
6162 ccEngine displacement6059 cc
432 HPPower431 HP
569 NmTorque569 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank71 lt
20,9 ltUrban consumption21,0 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,9 lt
15,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
ManualTransmission—
20Tyre size255/45 R20
NoABSYes

Dimensions

4836 mmLength5015 mm
1917 mmWidth1880 mm
1378 mmHeight1462 mm
1890 kgWeight1965 Kg
328 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase3048 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Chevrolet Camaro and 2010 Chrysler 300 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Camaro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…