2016 • Chevrolet
Camaro
Chevrolet Camaro 7.0 V8 (505 Hp) 2016Overall Score93.5/100
2016 Chevrolet Camaro vs 2018 Rolls-Royce Cullinan Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2018 • Rolls-Royce
Cullinan
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12 (571 Hp) 2018Overall Score92.5/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Camaro
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
93.5–92.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Chevrolet CamaroSpecificationRolls-Royce Cullinan
ChevroletMakeRolls-Royce
CamaroModelCullinan
2016Model year2018
CoupeBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Chevrolet CamaroSpecificationRolls-Royce Cullinan
—0–100 km/h5,2 s
277 km/hTop speed250 km/h
6997 ccEngine displacement6749 cc
505 HPPower571 HP
652 NmTorque850 Nm
8Cylinders12
Fuel & Consumption
Chevrolet CamaroSpecificationRolls-Royce Cullinan
PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank0 lt
—Urban consumption21,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,9 lt
—Average consumption15,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Chevrolet CamaroSpecificationRolls-Royce Cullinan
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8
305/30 ZR19Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Chevrolet CamaroSpecificationRolls-Royce Cullinan
4884 mmLength5341 mm
1953 mmWidth2000 mm
1330 mmHeight1835 mm
1732 KgWeight2660 Kg
2852 mmWheelbase3295 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Chevrolet Camaro and 2018 Rolls-Royce Cullinan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Camaro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…