DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Chevrolet Camaro vs 2001 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.5–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeOpel
CamaroModelOmega
1999Model year2001
CoupeBody typeEstate
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

6,0 s0–100 km/h7,0 s
254 km/hTop speed250 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
310 HPPower310 HP
472 NmTorque450 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank75 lt
18,9 ltUrban consumption18 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
—Average consumption14 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
245/50 ZR16Tyre size235/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4910 mmLength4898 mm
1880 mmWidth1776 mm
1300 mmHeight1540 mm
1570 KgWeight1690 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Chevrolet Camaro and 2001 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…